Natural Gas prices are up almost 100% from last year and on September 28th they touched $6.28 a dekatherm (DTH), a level seen back in 2008 when Natural Gas Prices (NYMEX) hit over $10 per DTH. In Europe is even worse as the gas prices have soared over 287% in the last 12 months and in the UK the gas futures are trading at £18.1/DTH ($24.96/DTH). Natural Gas is responsible for producing 35% of electricity in the US in 2021 so the increase in gas prices is affecting electric prices too. There are several factors that have contributed to what they are calling it “Gas Crisis”.

First is Low Level of inventories. Gas inventories in the US are 7.6% below the 5 year average and 16.8% lower than last year. In Europe storage is 37% full compared to 74% earlier this year. It is expected that at the end of the winter the storage might drop to 16%. These low levels of gas are very concerning if the winter will be cold that might lead huge price spikes at least to blackouts at the worst.

Second is un/natural disasters. In the US, the hurricane Ida, has shut down over 77% of production in Gulf of Mexico. In Europe, Russia, a huge supplier of Natural Gas, is using more gas themselves and exporting less. Europe doesn’t produce natural gas so they depend on imports from Russia, Norway and LNG (Liquified Natural Gas) from the US. Because of this dependency, EU has bet on clean energy such as wind power, which has been affected due to non-windy weather this summer, and hydro power in Southern Europe which saw major draught season. Therefore Europe has to depend on natural gas to produce electricity. Also in the UK a major fire knocked out a high-voltage power cable that export electric from the UK to France and the peak times electric prices moved from £40/MWH to £2500/MWH.  

Finally is huge demand. Due to the economies opening up, the demand for natural gas has been very high. Also the hot summer not only affected the supply of green energy (hydro and wind) but also increased demand since customers were using air conditioning on top of the demand from commercial and industrial clients. 

The US has been an isolated island when it came to natural gas, however, in the last few years it has increased exports of LNG and its prices are correlating more with those of Asia and Europe. Therefore a crisis in Europe and Asia does affect US Natural Gas prices. Nevertheless, weather is extremely important because it will dictate the short term prices of natural gas: it will be a warm winter, prices are predicted to be around $3/DTH, if the winter is normal prices will be on the $5/DTH range and if it is a cold winter then prices might hit $8/DTH – $10/DTH.

So with natural gas prices shooting up almost every week what can clients do to lower their operating expenses? The natural gas crisis seems to be lasting until this Winter is over and depending on temperatures this will last until April. The best strategy would be to fix the rate for the short term until April and once prices start to come down then fix the price for a longer period of time.

F&D Partners helps over 1500 clients reduce their energy costs by strategically procuring their energy. Contact Us today for a Free Analysis on your energy costs.

The changes in the energy market this August included an increase in electricity and natural gas prices and a piece of new legislation to reduce inflation and help with climate change. Energy prices continued to climb in August thanks to the strong demand for electricity and return of the Freeport LNG terminal to normal operations sooner than expected. Despite high natural gas prices in 2022, the Henry Hub price for natural gas is expected to average $7.54/MMBtu in the second half of 2022 and drop to $5.10/MMBtu in 2023. With demand for natural gas exceeding supply, inventories are at an all-time low, driving up the prices to all-time highs. The rising price of natural gas caused a spike in electricity prices this year because of its use in generating power.

This year U.S. natural gas inventories have less in storage than previous years. At the end of July, U.S. natural gas inventories had 2.5 Tcf in storage, 12% lower than the five-year average. By the end of October, or the end of the injection season, it is expected that natural gas inventories would reach 3.5 Tcf in storage, 6% lower than the five-year average. The EIA forecasts that LNG exports will average 10.0 Bcf/d in the third quarter of 2022 and 11.2 Bcf/d for all of 2022, a 14% increase from 2021 (EIA, 2022). In the first half of 2022 the U.S. became the largest LNG exporter in the world with nearly 70 percent of its exports going to Europe. The U.S. natural gas exports increased by 12 percent compared to the second half of 2021. The increase in LNG capacity, raised international natural gas and LNG prices, and higher global demand all contributed to the spike in exports from the U.S. Exports from the U.S. are expected to increase from 11.2 Bcf/d to 12.7 Bcf/d in 2023. Since Europe reduced their imports of LNG from Russia, over the past 5-6 months, 64 percent or 7.3 Bcf/d of U.S. LNG exports went to Europe.

The U.S. natural gas consumption is up by 3% with the 2022 forecast predicting averages of 85.2 Bcf/d an increase of 3% from 2021. The increase in price from the demand spike for natural gas resulted in an increase in electricity demand because of limited switching from natural gas-powered generators to coal-powered generators. Rising temperature in the U.S. and rising economic activity are also contributing to the rising prices of electricity. Electricity generation is coming from renewable energy sources such as solar and wind which provided 22% of the U.S. generation throughout 2022. Prices for electricity have increased by 6.1% to an average 14.6 cents per kWh in 2022. The annual wholesale average electricity price in the ISO New England and New York Markets is $95/MWh. Another factor that plays a role in the rising energy prices is inflation, or the overall increase in prices. The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 released on Wednesday, July 27, 2022, by Sen. Schumer and Sen Manchin contains a set of provisions to promote clean energy production, addresses climate change, and facilitates domestic energy production. The Inflation Reduction Act protects ratepayers from volatility in natural gas prices because electricity rates are expected to decrease despite high natural gas prices. According to Resources for the Future the retail price of electricity is expected to drop 5.2-6.7 percent over the next decade. This will end up saving consumers a total of $209-278 billion. With more buildings and households becoming more energy efficient, emission drops of 69.8 percent to 74.9 percent below 2005 levels are expected by 2030.

Greenhouse emissions are expected to be reduced by 1 gigaton by 2030.

The energy outlook is hopeful for 2023 and depending on the severity of the winter weather, international issues, and market conditions we can see price drops as soon as the first half of 2023 where F&D Partners will recommend a different pricing strategy.

A little about us:

F&D Partners is one of the leading energy consultant and engineering firms in the deregulated market, established in July of 2015 and is based in New York City. We currently manage the energy for 1,500 clients in nearly 20 states and five Canadian provinces. We work to find the most competitive prices for electric and natural gas in the market to save our clients up to 40% on their energy bills. 

 For comments, please email us at:

Over the past month, natural gas prices went down because of the closing of the Freeport liquified natural gas export terminal in Texas. The closing of the terminal eliminated much of the foreign demand for natural gas but also increased the reliance of the U.S. on imports. With the explosion at the Oneok liquified natural gas facility during the first week of July, the consequences are predicted to be minimal if natural gas is rerouted to one of the nine other processing plants they own.

As of Monday, July 11th, natural gas prices increased by 8.72 percent because of heat predictions for most areas in the U.S. These predictions resulted in increased air conditioning demand. The increased demand was met with supply issues because of the reduced amount of natural gas in storage this year (EIA, 2022). This year natural gas inventories are 12.2 percent below the seasonal average. On the week ending on July 6th, eighteen vessels left the US carrying 71 Bcf of liquified natural gas.

Net injections into the storage totaled 60 Bcf for the week ending on July 1st. Compared with the five-year average net injections of 60 Bcf and last year’s injections of 25Bcf during the same week, working natural gas stocks totaled 2,311 Bcf, which is 322 Bcf lower than the five-year average and 261 Bcf lower than this time last year (EIA, 2022).

Over the past twelve months, the average monthly spot prices have more than doubled, with natural gas prices increasing by $3.86 per million British thermal units because of low inventory levels coupled with high demand. The shutdown of the Freeport liquified natural gas terminal caused supply and demand to become more balanced resulting in a 40% decrease in the price of liquified natural gas from June 8th to July 6th.

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the forecast for the summer of 2022 includes retail sales of electricity to be 0.4% higher than last summer. This growth is a result of increased electricity sales to the commercial and industrial sectors, representing continued economic recovery from the pandemic. The forecast also predicts that the U.S. residential sector sales of electricity will fall 2.0% during the summer of 2022. The usage of a typical residential customer will average 1,050 kWh per month between June and August 2022, which would be 2.9% lower than in 2021 (US Department of Energy, 2022). The forecast for lower electricity usage is a result of the idea that the summer will be milder than last year. The forecast was proven to be incorrect when a heat wave hit the states in mid-July, thus increasing demand and casing the price of natural gas to rise by 7 percent. The average gas output in the lower 48 states in the U.S. rose to 96.2 bcfd so far in July from 95.3 bcfd in June. It is expected that the US electric power sector will generate 1,150 billion kWh of energy this summer, which is about the same as last summer. The cost of natural gas delivered to power generators will average $8.81/MMbtu during the summer of 2022, an increase of 124% from last summer. The increased gas prices have a direct correlation between the inflexibility in gas-to-coal switching for power generation along with constraints on increasing natural gas production.

The continuation of the war in Ukraine has resulted in supply issues for natural gas in many countries. The war put more stress on the economy while it was recovering from the pandemic because of supply chain disruptions, weak investment in energy production, and a rapid rebound in global demand. The global rise in inflation resulted sharp increase in prices over the past year, making it harder to obtain natural gas in large quantities. In 2019 the United States stopped importing petroleum gases from Russia (Roberts, 2022). This choice means that the ban of Russian energy imports did not directly affect natural gas prices in the U.S. The decreased production of energy during the pandemic negatively affected the U.S. because prices skyrocketed when demand rapidly began to increase. When the world began to open again the supply of energy was high because of the decrease in demand during the pandemic. After some time, the natural gas in storage became depleted when people returned to work and industries opened. This caused prices to rapidly increase along with demand.

Gas Prices in 2016

Natural gas prices rose by 59% in 2016 compared with 2015. That was the highest increase since 2005.

The highest price of 2016 was $3.99 per MMBTu (Million British Thermal Units) on December 28th, 243% higher than the lowest prices of 2016 of $1.64 on March 3rd.

So what are the main drivers of such price increases in the gas markets?

First, is the weather forecast. In mid-January, an arctic blast is expected to hit northern and northwest and temperatures will be as low as they were in 2013-2014 (when gas prices skyrocketed). Around 50% of the US households use natural gas a source for heating. Cold weather drives the demand up which will lead to price increases.

Secondly, is the level of gas inventories. The level of inventories fell from the 5-year average due to high demand (caused by cold weather). In December of 2015, the inventories fell by 58 Bcf (billion cubic feet) while in the last week of December 2016, it fell by 209 Bcf (almost 400% higher). The 5-year average was 80 Bcf.

Thirdly, is the natural gas production. In 2016, the US gas production fell for the first time in 10 years. The President Elect, Donald Trump, has promised to reduce regulatory restrictions on the exploration and production of natural gas and oil. These actions will increase the level of natural gas supply and pressure the prices to go down.

In the third week of December 2016, the gas consumption rose by 25% compared with the same period in 2015. The EIA (U.S. Energy Information Administration) estimates that US natural gas prices could average $3.27 per MMBtu in 2017. It averaged $2.49 per MMBtu in 2016 and $2.63 per MMBtu in 2015.

Are you protected from price increases in 2017? Call us today for a free consultation: (212) 843 – 1869/1870.

F&D Partners

HQ: 1271 Avenue of the America, Suite 4300 (43rd Floor)

New York, NY, 10020

O: (212) 843 – 1869

F: (212) 292 – 3801

BUCHANAN, N.Y. — Every so often, catastrophes prompt fresh worries about the Indian Point nuclear power plant, whose twin domes loom over the Hudson River about 45 miles north of Midtown Manhattan.

In 2001, the terror attacks on Sept. 11 spurred calls to shut down the two reactors here, amid concern of a similar attack on the plant. Five years ago, the Fukushima nuclear accident in Japan raised fears about the impact of a natural disaster on Indian Point.

Now, a construction project — the planned expansion of a natural gas pipeline across Indian Point property — is again putting the power plant in a harsh glare. Elected officials, residents and environmental activists have criticized the project, saying that a rupture of the pipeline could unleash a nuclear catastrophe.

Federal regulators have already approved the pipeline expansion, and Spectra Energy, the company overseeing the pipeline project, has begun construction along parts of its 1,000-mile line running through New York, Connecticut, Rhode Island and Massachusetts. In Westchester County, work has begun on the pipeline, including at the 240-acre Indian Point site, where Spectra plans to replace its existing 26-inch wide pipeline with one measuring 42 inches wide.

In recent months, Senators Chuck Schumer and Kirsten E. Gillibrand, both New York Democrats, as well as other federal, state and local officials, have demanded an independent safety evaluation of the risks posed by the pipeline expansion at Indian Point. The project’s approval by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission was based in part on an analysis conducted by Etnergy Corporation, which owns the power plant, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which determined that the plant could continue to operate safely in the event of a rupture or could be temporarily shut down.

On Monday, the state plans to notify the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission that it will take a hard look at the project in light of a series of problems at the nuclear plant since last May. In addition, the state will ask federal regulators to suspend their approval of the project — effectively halting construction — until the study is completed.

“I am directing my administration to commence an immediate independent safety analysis of the natural gas pipeline project,” Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo, a Democrat, said. “The safety of New Yorkers is the first responsibility of state government when making any decision.”

So far, federal agencies have declined to conduct independent assessments of their own. Neil Sheehan, a spokesman for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, said a specialist within the agency had looked carefully at hypothetical accidents. “Our expert confirmed that both units could safely shut down, even if the pipeline were to rupture and a blast of flame were to come from that line,” he said.

But the Union of Concerned Scientists, an advocacy group, has asked Stephen G. Burns, the regulatory commission’s chairman, to evaluate the methodology used by its own staff. “It is not sufficient to have the right answers until all the right questions have been asked,” David A. Lochbaum, director of the group’s Nuclear Safety Project, wrote in a letter in August. Mr. Burns declined the organization’s request.

Officials from both Spectra Energy and Entergy, which will receive a one-time payment for use of the right of way on its land, say that the new pipeline will be located several hundred feet farther away from the nuclear reactors than the smaller, existing pipeline. Jerry Nappi, a spokesman for Entergy, said the new pipeline would cross the southeast corner of its property, about 1,200 feet from the Unit 3 reactor.

In addition, he said, the larger pipeline would be buried deeper than the existing one and would be covered by thick concrete slabs.

Environmental activists from New York City and Westchester County are not mollified by those precautions. Since Spectra was given the go-ahead to proceed with construction, they have gathered 30,000 signatures on a petition demanding that Mr. Cuomo stop the project and study the risks.

Mr. Cuomo has been vociferous in his demand that federal regulators not relicense Indian Point. (The reactors’ licenses expired in 2013 and 2015, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission is now considering their renewal.) But until now, Mr. Cuomo has been largely silent about the pipeline.

Spectra, based in Texas, is expanding sections of its so-called Algonquin Pipeline in several states to increase delivery of natural gas to meet what the company says is growing demand in New England. Besides safety concerns, critics of the pipeline also say that enhancing the delivery of fossil fuels like natural gas will hurt efforts to counter climate change.

The Massachusetts attorney general, Maura Healey, last fall released an energy report of the region. “This study demonstrates that we do not need increased gas capacity to meet electric reliability needs and that electric ratepayers shouldn’t foot the bill for additional pipelines,” she said, adding that increasing energy efficiency would “significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions.”

Problems have bedeviled Indian Point for years, sometimes leading to the temporary shutdown of its reactors. In May, a transformer fire knocked out one of the reactors and spewed oil and fire-retardant foam into the Hudson. This month, Entergy revealed that radioactive water was found in three of 40 monitoring wells on site, the result of contamination from tritium, a radioactive isotope.

In recent months, activists have turned up the intensity of their protests against the pipeline expansion. Members of faith organizations and environmental groups held a vigil on Saturday outside the house in Mount Kisco, N.Y., that Mr. Cuomo shares with his girlfriend, Sandra Lee. Their home is less than 10 miles from Indian Point.

Activists have also held rallies and engaged in acts of civil disobedience. In November, nine people joined hands and blocked a road near a site where some of Spectra Energy’s construction equipment and vehicles were stored in Montrose, a hamlet in the town of Cortlandt, not far from Indian Point.

The activists were arrested and charged with disorderly conduct. The defendants, who call themselves the Montrose Nine, are awaiting trial. “They felt it was their obligation to stop the construction of what they believe is an extraordinarily dangerous venture,” Martin R. Stolar, their lawyer, said.

A group called ResistAIM, which stands for the Algonquin Incremental Market project, as Spectra calls the expansion, has organized periodic workshops on the ABC’s of civil disobedience.

“We organize nonviolent direct action to stop the AIM pipeline from being built,” its website says. “We do this because it is clear that we have no other alternative — we have tried everything to get the attention of elected officials and to use regulatory channels, and Spectra is building the pipeline anyway.”

Patrick Robbins, co-director of Sane Energy Project, which advocates renewable energy, also works with ResistAIM. He contends that continued resistance to the pipeline project, despite the fact that it has the needed approvals, was not fruitless. Indeed, he and others are focused on the larger war against fossil fuels, more than any one battle.

“Every day you stop construction, it hurts their timetable,” he said, referring to Spectra Energy. “And it sends a message to other companies, investors and political officials that the landscape has changed on building these pipelines, and that it’s not going to be an easy fight for them.”


States like Texas will face economic challenges because of the drop in oil prices. Credit Michael Stravato for The New York Times


The oil industry, with its history of booms and busts, is in its deepest downturn since the 1990s, if not earlier.

Earnings are down for companies that made record profits in recent years, leading them to decommission more than two-thirds of their rigs and sharply cut investment in exploration and production. Scores of companies have gone bankrupt and an estimated 250,000 oil workers have lost their jobs.

The cause is the plunging price of a barrel of oil, which has fallen more than 70 percent since June 2014.

Prices recovered a few times last year, but a barrel of oil has already sunk this year to its lowest level since 2004. Executives think it will be years before oil returns to $90 or $100 a barrel, a price that was pretty much the norm over the last decade.


What is the current price of oil?

Brent crude, the main international benchmark, was trading at around $34 a barrel on Thursday.

The American benchmark was at around $32 a barrel.


Why has the price of oil been dropping so fast? Why now?




This a complicated question, but it boils down to the simple economics of supply and demand.

United States domestic production has nearly doubled over the last several years, pushing out oil imports that need to find another home. Saudi, Nigerian and Algerian oil that once was sold in the United States is suddenly competing for Asian markets, and the producers are forced to drop prices. Canadian and Iraqi oil production and exports are rising year after year. Even the Russians, with all their economic problems, manage to keep pumping.

There are signs, however, that production is falling because of the drop in exploration investments. Wood MacKenzie, a consulting firm, identified 68 large oil and natural gas projects worldwide, with a combined value of $380 billion, that have been put on hold around the world since prices started coming down, halting the production of 2.9 million barrels a day.

Meanwhile, RBC Capital Markets has calculated projects capable of producing more than a half million barrels a day of oil were cancelled, delayed or shelved by OPEC countries alone last year, and this year promises more of the same.

But the drop in production is not happening fast enough, especially with output from deep waters off the Gulf of Mexico and Canada continuing to build as new projects come online.

On the demand side, the economies of Europe and developing countries are weak and vehicles are becoming more energy-efficient. So demand for fuel is lagging a bit.


Who benefits from the price drop?

Any motorist can tell you that gasoline prices have dropped. Diesel, heating oil and natural gas prices have also fallen sharply.

The latest drop in energy prices — regular gas nationally now averages around $1.82 a gallon, roughly down about 25 cents from the same time a year ago — is also disproportionately helping lower-income groups, because fuel costs eat up a larger share of their more limited earnings.

Households that use heating oil to warm their homes are also seeing savings.


Who loses?
For starters, oil-producing countries and states. Venezuela, Nigeria, Ecuador, Brazil and Russia are just a few petrostates that are suffering economic and perhaps even political turbulence.

The impact of Western sanctions caused Iranian production to drop by about one million barrels a day in recent years and blocked Iran from importing the latest Western oil field technology and equipment. With sanctions now being lifted, the Iranian oil industry is expected to open the taps on production soon.

In the United States, Alaska, North Dakota, Texas, Oklahoma and Louisiana are facing economic challenges.

Chevron, Royal Dutch Shell and BP have all announced cuts to their payrolls to save cash, and they are in far better shape than many smaller independent oil and gas producers that are slashing dividends and selling assets as they report net losses. Other companies have slashed their dividends.


What happened to OPEC?

A central factor in the sharp price drops, analysts say, is the continuing unwillingness of OPEC, a cartel of oil producers, to intervene to stabilize markets that are widely viewed as oversupplied.

Iran, Venezuela, Ecuador and Algeria have been pressing the cartel to cut production to firm up prices, but Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and other gulf allies are refusing to do so. At the same time, Iraq is actually pumping more, and Iran is expected to become a major exporter again.

Saudi officials have said that if they cut production and prices go up, they will lose market share and merely benefit their competitors. They say they are willing to see oil prices go much lower, but some oil analysts think they are merely bluffing.

If prices remain low for another year or longer, the newly crowned King Salman may find it difficult to persuade other OPEC members to keep steady against the financial strains. The International Monetary Fund estimates that the revenues of Saudi Arabia and its Persian Gulf allies will slip by $300 billion this year.

Is there a conspiracy to bring the price of oil down?

There are a number of conspiracy theories floating around. Even some oil executives are quietly noting that the Saudis want to hurt Russia and Iran, and so does the United States — motivation enough for the two oil-producing nations to force down prices. Dropping oil prices in the 1980s did help bring down the Soviet Union, after all.

But there is no evidence to support the conspiracy theories, and Saudi Arabia and the United States rarely coordinate smoothly. And the Obama administration is hardly in a position to coordinate the drilling of hundreds of oil companies seeking profits and answering to their shareholders.

When are oil prices likely to recover?

Not anytime soon. Oil production is not declining fast enough in the United States and other countries, though that could begin to change this year. But there are signs that supply and demand — and price — could recover some balance by the end of 2016.

Demand for fuels is recovering in some countries, and that could help crude prices recover in the next year or two. There is now little or no spare production capacity to give the market a cushion in case of another crisis in a crucial oil-producing country.


Article Source:


SCRIBA, N.Y. – Game over. The FitzPatrick nuclear plant in Oswego County will close by early 2017, company officials said.

Talks with state officials failed to arrive at a plan to keep the plant open, and the talks have concluded, said Tammy Holden, speaking for plant owner Entergy Corp.

Entergy today notified the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission that it intends to shut down the FitzPatrick plant permanently. The NRC notice is required to be filed within 30 days of a decision to retire a nuclear plant. It “confirms the reality of the plant’s closure at the end of the current operating cycle,” according to a memo FitzPatrick officials sent to employees today.




Entergy officials said this action closes the door on the talks between Entergy and New York state officials about possibly reversing the decision to close.

“Entergy and state officials worked very hard over the past two months to reach a constructive and mutually beneficial agreement to avoid a shutdown, but were unsuccessful. Yes, discussions have concluded,” Holden said.

Entergy announced Nov. 2 that FitzPatrick would close by early 2017.

Plant employees were notified today that the letter had been sent to the NRC.

NRC spokesman Neil Sheehan said nuclear plant operators are required to give the commission notice within 30 days after deciding to permanently close a facility. They also are required to notify the NRC once the plant has permanently shut down and the fuel has been removed from the reactor, he said.

Brian Sullivan, site vice president at FitzPatrick, asked employees in a memo to remain focused on safety despite the disappointing news.

“As difficult as it is, we must move forward with preparing our action plan for operations through the end of the cycle and our preparations for decommissioning,” he wrote. “Meetings on both have already started and details will be shared with the rest of team as we move forward. Again, I ask you all not to let today’s filing distract you. I know it’s another difficult step in the process and one that confirms the reality of the plant’s closure at the end of the current operating cycle.”

Despite the seeming finality of Entergy’s statements, union officials still suspect the company of playing “high stakes poker” in an effort to win concessions from state officials, said Ted Skerpon, president of IBEW Local 97. Skerpon pointed out that Entergy continued to negotiate with representatives of Gov. Andrew Cuomo after announcing Nov. 2 that the plant would close.

Assemblyman Will Barclay, R-Pulaski, also expressed hope today that the door remains open to saving FitzPatrick.

“I’m very disappointed with the news that Entergy has filed with the NRC and I urge that talks continue with the governor,” Barclay sadi. “I’m going to continue to work to do what I can to keep the plant operational.”

Cuomo’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. But Entergy officials said the talks are over.

“After many weeks of negotiations, it became apparent that we would not be able to reach a mutually agreeable decision with the state,” Holden said.

Regarding the closure notice to the NRC, “we are not aware of such a letter ever being withdrawn,” Holden said.

Entergy executives and state officials have never divulged the details of their talks. Many observers speculate that Entergy sought a compromise that would allow it to operate the profitable Indian Point nuclear station for a defined period in returning for keeping FitzPatrick open. Cuomo has fought Entergy’s application for a license renewal at Indian Point.